• EI
  • Scopus
  • 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020

熟制方式对裹糊猪排品质及挥发性香气成分的影响

刘树萍, 方伟佳, 石长波

刘树萍, 方伟佳, 石长波. 熟制方式对裹糊猪排品质及挥发性香气成分的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(1): 257-265,270. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019120288
引用本文: 刘树萍, 方伟佳, 石长波. 熟制方式对裹糊猪排品质及挥发性香气成分的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2021, 42(1): 257-265,270. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019120288
LIU Shu-ping, FANG Wei-jia, SHI Chang-bo. Effects of Different Cooking Methods on the Quality and Volatile Aroma Components of Wrapped Pork Chops[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(1): 257-265,270. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019120288
Citation: LIU Shu-ping, FANG Wei-jia, SHI Chang-bo. Effects of Different Cooking Methods on the Quality and Volatile Aroma Components of Wrapped Pork Chops[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2021, 42(1): 257-265,270. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019120288

熟制方式对裹糊猪排品质及挥发性香气成分的影响

基金项目: 

烹饪科学四川省高等学校重点实验室资助项目(PRKX201906);黑龙江省博士后科研启动金(LBH-Q15072);2016年哈尔滨商业大学青年创新人才支持项目(2016QN059);哈尔滨商业大学博士科研启动(12DW030);2016年度哈尔滨商业大学校内课题团队项目(2016TD003);2019年度黑龙江省高等教育教学改革一般研究项目(SJGY20190336)。

详细信息
    作者简介:

    刘树萍(1982-),女,博士,副教授,研究方向:传统烹饪工业化,E-mail:liusp201@163.com。

  • 中图分类号: TS251.6

Effects of Different Cooking Methods on the Quality and Volatile Aroma Components of Wrapped Pork Chops

  • 摘要: 为探讨熟制方式对裹糊猪排品质和风味影响,采用常规物化测定方法,研究不同熟制方式(煎、炸、烤)对裹糊猪排猪排质构、水分含量、最大形变量、烹饪损失率、风味影响。结果表明:3种熟制方式比较分析显示煎制与烤制对猪排的剪切力影响显著(P<0.05),而炸制温度对裹糊猪排咀嚼性影响显著(P<0.05)。煎制较炸制与烤制而言,烹饪损失率较小且水分流失较少。电子鼻结果显示主成分分析和线性判别分析可以量化主成分贡献率和样品间风味的区分。风味成分结果进一步表明:这三种熟制方式得到的风味化合物主要包括:醇类、醛类、酯类、酸类、杂环类共5大类。煎制形成的风味种类最高(44),烤制次之(37),炸制最少(35);煎制和炸制中均为醇类相对含量较高,而烤制中烃类相对含量较高,3种熟制方式共有挥发性物质12种,煎、炸、烤独有成分分别为7、3、9种。结果表明从食用品质和风味角度分析,煎制裹糊猪排色泽金黄、口感软嫩、风味突出、品质更佳,本文为裹糊猪排熟制提供一定理论依据。
    Abstract: In order to explore the effect of different cooking methods on the quality and flavor of wrapped pork chops,the effects of different cooking methods(decocting,frying,and baking)on the texture,water content,maximum shape variables,cooking loss rate and flavor of fried pork chops were studied by conventional physicochemical methods. The results showed that the effect of decocting and baking on the shear strength of pork chops was significant(P<0.05),while frying temperature had a significant effect on the mastication of wrapped pork chops(P<0.05). Compared with frying and baking samples,cooking loss rate and water diversion loss was less in decocting samples. In terms of electronic nose result,the principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis could quantify the contribution rate of principal components and the difference of flavor among samples. Furthermore,the flavor results showed that the flavor compounds obtained by the three cooking methods mainly included five categories: alcohols,aldehydes,esters,acids,and heterocycles. The highest flavor types were decocting(44),followed by baking(37),and frying(35). The relative content of alcohol was higher in decocting and frying,while the relative content of hydrocarbon was higher in baking. There were 12 kinds of sane volatile substances in the three cooking methods,and 7,3,9 kinds of unique components in decocting,frying,and baking. In general,from the perspective of food quality and flavor,fried pork chops were golden in color,soft and tender in taste,outstanding in flavor and better in quality.
  • [1] 牟笛,许静斯,冯佳昊,等. 我国猪肉供应风险及对策研究[J]. 中国科学院院刊,2020,35(3):363-370.
    [2]

    Elisa D H,Alvija S,Per E. Low-temperature long-time cooking of meat:Eating quality and underlying mechanisms[J]. Meat Science,2018,143:104-113.

    [3]

    Wang X J,Bertrand M,Wang X W,et al. Comparison between microwave and traditional water bath cooking on saltiness perception,water distribution and microstructure of grass crap meat[J]. Food Research International,2019,125:108-521.

    [4] 沈铭聪,周名洋,孙杨赢,等. 不同加热方法对盐水鹅食用品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2019,40(11):63-69.
    [5] 陈美花,潘佳丽,翁文治. 添加成分对外裹糊流变性能及外裹糊鱼块油炸过程油脂渗透的影响[J]. 食品科学,2019,1-10.
    [6] 马菲,郇延军,刁欣悦. 酱制时间对传统酱卤猪肉制品风味及质构变化规律的影响[J]. 食品与机械,2019,35(9):55-63.
    [7] 杜云豪,刘长虹,王雪青,等.发酵方式对馒头在冷藏过程中品质及其货架期的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,41(9):264-268.
    [8] 刘树萍,冯爽,方伟佳. 电子鼻在辣白菜腌制及发酵工艺中的应用研究[J]. 中国调味品,2019,44(12):99-103.
    [9] 李超,徐为民,王道营,等. 加热过程中肉嫩度变化的研究[J]. 食品科学,2009,30(11):262-265.
    [10] 王兆明,贺稚非,余力,等. 加热后兔肉中心温度的变化对其品质特性的影响[J]. 食品科学,2015,36(19):67-71.
    [11] 孔保华,王宇,夏秀芳,等. 加热温度对猪肉肌原纤维蛋白凝胶特性的影响[J]. 食品科学,2011,32(5):50-54.
    [12] 钟华珍,刘永峰,甘斐,等. 高温加工方式对肉品质的影响[J]. 食品与机械,2017,33(11):190-194.
    [13]

    Pathare P B,Roskilly A P. Quality and energy evaluation in meat cooking[J]. Food Engineering Reviews,2016,8(4):435-447.

    [14] 李鸣,邢通,王虎虎,等. 加工工艺对白切鸡品质及微生物状况的影响[J]. 食品科学,2018,39(11):32-38.
    [15]

    Tornber G E. Effects of heat on meat proteins-implications on structure and quality of meat products[J]. Meat Sci,2005,70(3):493-508.

    [16]

    Jaud M,Rouveure R,Faure P,et al. Method for orthorectification of terrestrial radar maps[J]. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing,2014,97:185-194.

    [17]

    Wang Q,Li L,Ding W,et al. Adulterant identification in mutton by electronic nose and gas chromatography-mass spectrometer[J]. Food Control,2018,98:431-438.

    [18] 郑月,杨文昇,张宇辉,等. 不同加工方式"阳光猪肉"与普通冷鲜猪肉风味差异探究[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2020:1-11. Doi: org/10.13995

    /j.cnki.11-1802/ts.023179.

    [19]

    Meinert L,Andersen L T,Bredie W L P,et al. Chemical and sensory characterisation of pan-fried pork flavour:Interactions between raw meat quality,ageing and frying temperature[J]. Meat Science,2007,75(2):229-242.

    [20]

    LI N,Zheng F P,Chen H T,et al. Identification of volatile components in Chinese Sinkiang fermented camel milk using SAFE,SDE,and HS-SPME-GC/MS[J]. Food Chemistry,2011,129(3):1242-1252.

    [21] 孟祥忍,陈胜姝,陈昌,等. 油炸方式对黄金猪排风味品质研究[J]. 食品科技,2019,44(8):97-103.
    [22]

    Wojciech W. Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry for in situ determination of biogenic amines in meat:Estimation of meat's freshness[J]. Microchemical journal,2019,145:130-138.

    [23] 张梅超,慕金雨,刘敏,等. 姜汁对太平洋牡蛎(Crassostrea gigas)酶解液风味改善的研究[J]. 食品科学,2014,35(17):170-175.
    [24]

    Enilia F,Magdalena M. Species-specific peptide-based liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry monitoring of three poultry species in processed meat products[J]. Food Chemistry,2019,238(15):489-498.

    [25]

    Zhang Q,Qin W,Lin D,al. The changes in the volatile aldehydes formed during the deep-fat frying process[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology,2015,52(12):7683-7696.

    [26]

    Berendsen R L,Kalkhove S I C,Lugones L G,et al. Effects of the mushroom-volatile 1-octen-3-olon dry bubble disease[J]. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2013,12:5535-5543.

    [27]

    Sun W Z,Zhao Q Z,Zhao H F,et al. Volatile compounds of Cantonese sausage released at different stages of processing and storage[J]. Food Chemistry,2010,121(2):319-325.

    [28] 张哲奇,臧明伍,张凯华,等. 蒸制时间对粉蒸肉挥发性风味成分的影响[J]. 食品科学,2018,39(12):205-211.
    [29] 唐秋实,刘学铭,池建伟,等. 不同干燥工艺对杏鲍菇品质和挥发性风味成分的影响[J]. 食品科学,2016,37(4):25-30.
    [30]

    Andrés J,Rascón,Evaristo B. Trace level determination of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in raw and processed meat and fish products from European markets by GC-MS[J]. Food Control,2019,101:198-208.

    [31] 马菲,郇延军,刁欣悦,等. 酱制时间对传统酱卤猪肉制品风味及质构变化规律的影响[J]. 食品科学,2019,35(9):56-63.
    [32] 王学敬,李聪,王玉峰,等. SPME-GC-MS法分析德州扒鸡挥发性风味成分的条件优化及成分分析[J]. 南京农业大学学报,2016,39(3):495-501.
    [33] 李苗苗,王玉,薛勇,等. 南极磷虾虾糜热加工过程中的风味变化[J]. 食品工业科技,2018,39(20):35-40.
计量
  • 文章访问数: 
  • HTML全文浏览量: 
  • PDF下载量: 
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-12-26
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-01-07
  • 刊出日期:  2020-12-31

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回