• EI
  • Scopus
  • 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020

不同冻结和解冻方式对猪肉品质的影响

胡新, 姚亚明, 王鹏, 屠康

胡新, 姚亚明, 王鹏, 屠康. 不同冻结和解冻方式对猪肉品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2017, (19): 278-283. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.19.051
引用本文: 胡新, 姚亚明, 王鹏, 屠康. 不同冻结和解冻方式对猪肉品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2017, (19): 278-283. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.19.051
HU Xin, YAO Ya-ming, WANG Peng, TU Kang. Effects of different freezing and thawing methods on pork quality[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (19): 278-283. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.19.051
Citation: HU Xin, YAO Ya-ming, WANG Peng, TU Kang. Effects of different freezing and thawing methods on pork quality[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2017, (19): 278-283. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2017.19.051

不同冻结和解冻方式对猪肉品质的影响

基金项目: 

国家自然科学基金面上项目(31571769); 安徽省科技攻关项目(1604a0702031);

详细信息
    作者简介:

    胡新 (1991-) , 男, 硕士研究生, 研究方向:农产品贮藏与加工, E-mail:2015808104@njau.edu.cn。;

    屠康 (1968-) , 男, 博士, 教授, 研究方向:农产品无损检测、贮藏与加工, E-mail:kangtu@njau.edu.cn。;

  • 中图分类号: TS251.51

Effects of different freezing and thawing methods on pork quality

  • 摘要: 为探究冻结和解冻方式对猪肉品质的影响,以解冻汁液流失率,p H,脂类氧化(TBARS)值,蛋白质溶解度,滋味及微观结构的变化作为猪肉品质的评定指标。采用-18、-27、-70℃三种冻结温度进行冻结,冻结后-18℃冻藏3 d,每个冻结组解冻时均分别采用4℃低温空气、25℃静水、25℃空气三种方式进行解冻。结果表明:冻结方式与解冻方式对猪肉品质均有不同程度的影响。通过多因素方差分析可以得出,解冻汁液流失、蛋白质溶解度同时受冻结、解冻方式影响显著(p<0.05)。p H受冻结、解冻方式影响不显著(p>0.05);TBARS受解冻方式影响显著(p<0.05),受冻结方式影响不显著(p>0.05);解冻方式是影响滋味变化主要因素;-70℃冻结和4℃低温解冻能够较好地保持猪肉品质。 
    Abstract: To explore the effects of different freezing and thawing methods on the quality of pork. The thawing loss rate, p H, TBARS value, protein solubility, microstructure and the taste were measured to evaluate the quality of pork.Pork was frozen at-18, -27, -70 ℃ respectively, and each freeze group of the frozen meat was thawed at 4 ℃, 25 ℃ ( in water) , 25 ℃ ( in air) after 3 days storage.The results showed that the effect of freezing and thawing methods had different influence on pork quality.By multi-factor variance analysis, thawing loss and protein solubility were significantly ( p < 0.05) influenced by freezing and thawing methods.The p H value was not influenced by freezing and the thawing methods, TBARS values were significantly ( p <0.05) influenced by thawing methods.For the taste, the effects of thawing methods were greater than that of freezing methods.Freezing at-70 ℃ and thawing at 4 ℃ could keep the quality of pork meat.
  • [1] 欧阳杰, 谈佳玉, 沈建.速冻方式与温度对鲍鱼品质的影响[J].现代食品科技, 2014 (6) :214-218.
    [2]

    Boonsumrej S, Chaiwanichsiri S, Tantratian S, et al.Effects of freezing and thawing on the quality changes of tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) frozen by air-blast and cryogenic freezing[J].Journal of Food Engineering, 2007, 80 (1) :292-299.

    [3]

    Gon9alves A A, Gindri Junior C S G.The effect of glaze uptake on storage quality of frozen shrimp[J].Journal of Food Engineering, 2009, 90 (2) :285-290.

    [4] 郭恒, 钱怡, 李颖杰, 等.解冻温度对冷冻鲐鱼品质、质构及超微结构的影响[J].中国食品学报, 2014 (12) :49-56.
    [5] 邓敏.浸渍冻结流速及冻藏对草鱼块品质影响的研究[D].广州:华南理工大学, 2013.
    [6]

    Jiang J, Xiong Y L.Extreme p H treatments enhance the structure-reinforcement role of soy protein isolate and its emulsions in pork myofibrillar protein gels in the presence of microbial transglutaminase[J].Meat Science, 2013, 93 (3) :469-476.

    [7] 张春晖, 李侠, 李银, 等.低温高湿变温解冻提高羊肉的品质[J].农业工程学报, 2013 (6) :267-273.
    [8]

    Utrera M, Morcuende D, Estévez M.Temperature of frozen storage affects the nature and consequences of protein oxidation in beef patties[J].Meat Science, 2014, 96 (3) :1250-1257.

    [9] 余小领.冷冻和解冻工艺对猪肉保水性和组织结构的影响研究[D].南京:南京农业大学, 2007.
    [10]

    Mousakhani-Ganjeh A, Hamdami N, Soltanizadeh N.Effect of high voltage electrostatic field thawing on the lipid oxidation of frozen tuna fish (Thunnus albacares) [J].Innovative Food Science&Emerging Technologies, 2016, 36:42-47.

    [11]

    Lan Y, Shang Y, Song Y, et al.Changes in the quality of superchilled rabbit meat stored at different temperatures[J].Meat Science, 2016, 117:173-181.

    [12] 顾伟钢.煮制猪肉蛋白降解产物及保鲜方法研究[D].杭州:浙江大学, 2012.
    [13] 冯宪超, 周光宏.快速冷冻工艺对牛肉品质和组织结构的影响[J].食品科学, 2016, 37 (19) :1-7.
    [14] 任青.不同类别的食品冻结特性的研究[D].上海:上海海洋大学, 2014.
    [15]

    Leygonie C, Britz T J, Hoffman L C.Impact of freezing and thawing on the quality of meat:Review[J].Meat Science, 2012, 91 (2) :93-98.

    [16] 余力, 贺稚非, Batjargal Enkhmaa, 等.不同解冻方式对伊拉兔肉品质特性的影响[J].食品科学, 2015, 36 (14) :258-264.
    [17] 吕玉, 臧明伍, 史智佳, 等.解冻和加工过程中冷冻猪肉保水性的研究[J].中国食品学报, 2012 (1) :148-152.
    [18]

    Pan B S, Yeh W T.Biochemical and morphological changes in grass shrimp (Penaeus monodon) muscle following freezing by air blast and liquid nitrogen methods[J].Journal of Food Biochemistry, 1993, 17 (3) :147-160.

    [19]

    Ali S, Rajput N, Li C, et al.Effec t of Freeze-Thaw Cycles on Lipid Oxidation and Myowater in Broiler Chickens[J].Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola, 2016, 18 (1) :35-40.

    [20]

    Benjakul S, Bauer F.Biochemical and physicochemical changes in catfish (Silurus glanis Linne) muscle as influenced by different freeze-thaw cycles[J].Food Chemistry, 2001, 72 (2) :207-217.

    [21] 周光宏.畜产品加工学[Z].北京:中国农业出版社, 2004.
    [22]

    Wu X, Song X, Qiu Z, et al.Mapping of TBARS distribution in frozen-thawed pork using NIR hyperspectral imaging[J].Meat Science, 2015, 113:92-96.

    [23] 姜晴晴, 刘文娟, 鲁珺, 等.冻结与解冻处理对肉类品质影响的研究进展[J].食品工业科技, 2015 (8) :384-389.
计量
  • 文章访问数:  275
  • HTML全文浏览量:  28
  • PDF下载量:  509
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2017-03-23

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回